The year 2013 was a period of significant anticipation and questions in the medical coding field, particularly concerning the impending transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10. For individuals considering entering this profession, a crucial question arose: is medical coding a good career in 2013 amidst such substantial changes? This article delves into the career prospects of medical coding in 2013, addressing the concerns and offering insights relevant to that pivotal time.
The Medical Coding Landscape in 2013
In 2013, the healthcare industry in the United States was on the cusp of a major shift with the planned implementation of ICD-10, set to replace the outdated ICD-9 coding system. This transition was not merely a simple update; it represented a significant overhaul in how diagnoses and procedures were coded and classified. The complexity and breadth of ICD-10, with its vastly expanded number of codes, raised concerns and uncertainties among both seasoned and aspiring medical coders.
For those contemplating a career in medical coding in 2013, this environment presented a unique set of challenges and opportunities. The demand for skilled medical coders was already robust due to the ever-increasing volume and complexity of healthcare data. However, the ICD-10 transition added another layer to this demand, necessitating coders who were not only proficient in ICD-9 but also prepared to master the new ICD-10 system.
ICD-9 vs. ICD-10: Certification Strategies in 2013
A common question for individuals looking to get certified in medical coding during 2013 was whether to focus on ICD-9 or wait for ICD-10. This dilemma is well-illustrated in a discussion from a medical coding forum in 2013, where a user named Sally Holland inquired about the best course of action regarding certification in light of the upcoming ICD-10 changes.
Sally asked:
If I am planning on taking the CPC or CPC-H exam this year. Will I still have to be recertified again next year for ICD-10? I have heard several members state that it is mandatory for everyone and is offered online without being proctored. Would you advise that I just wait and take the exam next year with all of the upcoming changes. Some members are saying that it might not occur in 2014, due to the expense of the software for providers. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
This question reflects the uncertainty many felt at the time. Should aspiring coders delay their certification to directly learn ICD-10, or should they proceed with ICD-9 certification and adapt later?
Experienced members like Carolyn Heath provided valuable advice, emphasizing the importance of proceeding with ICD-9 certification. Carolyn stated:
All AAPC certified coders will have to take a proficiency assessment test for ICD-10. You will have two years–October 2013 to September 2015–to take the exam. It is 75 questions, unproctored, and you can use any resource available. It costs $60. If you don’t pass the first time, you will have a free retake. I highly recommend that you go ahead and take your certification exam as planned this year and all you need is to take the ICD-10 exam next year.
Carolyn’s advice highlighted that certification bodies like AAPC were providing a transition pathway. Coders certified in ICD-9 would have time to take an ICD-10 proficiency assessment, making it unnecessary to delay initial certification.
Alicia Scott, another expert in the forum, further reinforced this point, explaining the continued relevance of ICD-9:
Carolyn is correct. Do NOT wait if you can learn ICD-9 that is best because it is not going away. For several years you will need to do both. Things like workman’s comp will stay in ICD-9. Physicians will want people who can do both.
Alicia’s insights underscored a crucial aspect: ICD-9 knowledge would not become obsolete immediately with the introduction of ICD-10. Many systems and specific types of claims would still require ICD-9 coding for a transitional period. This made obtaining ICD-9 certification in 2013 a strategically sound move.
Why Medical Coding Was a Strong Career Choice in 2013 (and Beyond)
Based on the advice from experienced professionals and the overall healthcare landscape in 2013, medical coding presented a promising career path. Here’s why:
- High Demand: The healthcare industry is constantly growing, leading to a consistent demand for skilled medical coders to manage patient data and ensure accurate billing and reimbursement. The ICD-10 transition further amplified this demand, as the industry needed professionals proficient in both coding systems.
- Job Security: Healthcare is an essential service, and medical coding is a critical function within it. This translates to strong job security for qualified professionals, less susceptible to economic downturns compared to other sectors.
- Career Advancement: Starting as a medical coder could open doors to various career advancement opportunities within healthcare administration, auditing, compliance, and education. Specializations in specific coding areas could also lead to higher earning potential.
- Competitive Salary: Even in 2013, medical coding offered a competitive salary, with potential for growth based on experience, certifications, and specialization. The increasing complexity of coding with ICD-10 was expected to further enhance the value of skilled coders.
- Flexibility: Many medical coding positions offered flexibility, including remote work options, which appealed to individuals seeking work-life balance.
Conclusion: A Positive Outlook for Medical Coding in 2013
In conclusion, despite the uncertainties surrounding the ICD-10 transition, medical coding was indeed a good career in 2013. The demand for skilled professionals was strong, and the industry was actively preparing for the coding system update. For individuals like Sally Holland, the advice was clear: pursue ICD-9 certification, gain foundational knowledge, and then prepare for the ICD-10 proficiency assessment.
The transition period in 2013 highlighted the adaptability and continuous learning nature of the medical coding profession. Those entering the field at this time, and in the years that followed, needed to embrace change and commit to ongoing education to remain valuable assets in the evolving healthcare landscape. For those willing to invest in their skills and knowledge, medical coding offered a stable, rewarding, and in-demand career path, both in 2013 and into the future.
