Accurate medical coding is paramount in healthcare, especially when it comes to fracture care. Navigating the nuances of Fracture Care Medical Coding, particularly for closed treatments without manipulation, can significantly impact revenue cycles for healthcare providers. This article serves as a comprehensive guide to understanding and applying the correct coding practices for these often-misunderstood procedures, ensuring optimal reimbursement and compliance.
Understanding Fracture Treatment Modalities
When a patient presents with a traumatic fracture, orthopedic physicians have several treatment options available. These methods vary based on the fracture type and severity, and each requires distinct coding approaches. The four primary methods of fracture care are:
- Closed Reduction: This involves the non-surgical manipulation of fractured bone fragments to restore them to their normal anatomical alignment.
- Percutaneous Fixation: This surgical procedure involves inserting stabilizing devices like rods, plates, wires, pins, or screws across the fracture site, typically guided by imaging technology.
- Open Reduction with Internal Fixation (ORIF): ORIF is a more invasive surgical procedure where an incision is made to realign and fixate the separated bone fragments using internal fixation devices.
- Closed Treatment Without Manipulation: This non-surgical approach involves applying appropriate stabilizing materials to the patient to immobilize the fracture and support weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing function.
Decoding Closed Treatment Without Manipulation in Medical Coding
Among the fracture treatment options, closed treatment without manipulation is frequently the least understood in terms of medical coding. It’s crucial to recognize that even without surgical manipulation, this treatment method constitutes a billable service. The core of closed treatment without manipulation lies in the provision and fitting of medical supplies designed to immobilize the affected joint, allowing bone fragments to fuse naturally, or to provide necessary support for weight-bearing activities.
Examples of medical supplies utilized in closed treatment without manipulation include casts, splints, slings, braces, canes, walking boots, and crutches. It is essential to understand that if a healthcare provider does not apply a stabilizing medical supply or document a clear plan for follow-up care, reporting non-operative, non-manipulative fracture care codes is not appropriate. In such instances, the encounter should be coded as an Evaluation and Management (E/M) service, without any modifiers for the initial visit and using appropriate E/M service codes for subsequent, related visits.
Example Scenario: Consider a 17-year-old female soccer player who slips on a wet field during practice. Three days later, she consults her physician, who diagnoses a non-displaced left foot cuboid fracture during a level 3 established patient visit. The physician fits her with a custom-fabricated plastic ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) with an ankle joint and schedules a follow-up appointment in two weeks, or sooner if her pain does not subside. This scenario perfectly illustrates closed treatment without manipulation.
In terms of CPT® coding for this example, the correct codes are 28450-LT Treatment of tarsal bone fracture (except talus and calcaneus); without manipulation, each – Left side and 99213-57 Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: An expanded problem focused history; An expanded problem focused examination; Medical decision making of low complexity – Decision for surgery. Importantly, because the ankle-foot orthosis was provided in the office setting, the practice can bill for it separately using code L1970 Ankle foot orthosis, plastic with ankle joint, custom fabricated.
CPT Codes for Non-Operative, Non-Manipulative Fracture Care in Medical Coding
The following table outlines common fracture sites and their corresponding CPT codes for closed treatment without manipulation. Accurate code selection is crucial for proper claim submission in fracture care medical coding.
| Fracture Site | Code |
|---|---|
| Vertebral body | 22310 |
| Clavicle | 23500 |
| Scapula | 23570 |
| Proximal humerus | 23600 |
| Greater tuberosity | 23620 |
| Humeral shaft | 24500 |
| Humeral supra/transcondylar | 24530 |
| Humeral epicondylar | 24560 |
| Humeral condyle | 24576 |
| Radial head/neck | 24650 |
| Proximal ulna | 24670 |
| Radial shaft (alone) | 25500 |
| Ulnar shaft (alone) | 25530 |
| Radial and ulnar shafts | 25560 |
| Distal radius | 25600 |
| Carpal scaphoid | 25622 |
| Other carpal bone | 25630 |
| Ulnar styloid | 25650 |
| Metacarpal | 26600 |
| Phalangeal shaft | 26720 |
| Articular metacarpophalangeal (MCP)/ interphalangeal (IP) joint | 26740 |
| Distal phalanx | 26750 |
| Posterior pelvic ring | 27197 |
| Acetabulum (hip socket) | 27220 |
| Proximal femur/neck | 27230 |
| Fracture Site | Code |
| Trochanteric inter-/peri-/sub- | 27238 |
| Greater trochanter | 27246 |
| Proximal femur/head | 27267 |
| Femoral shaft | 27500 |
| Femoral supra/transcondylar | 27501 |
| Distal femoral condyle | 27508 |
| Distal femoral epiphyseal separation | 27516 |
| Patellar | 27520 |
| Proximal tibia (plateau) | 27530 |
| Tibial shaft | 27750 |
| Medial malleolus | 27760 |
| Posterior malleolus | 27767 |
| Fibula proximal/shaft | 27780 |
| Distal fibula/lateral malleolus | 27786 |
| Bimalleolar ankle | 27808 |
| Trimalleolar ankle | 27816 |
| Distal tibia weight bearing articular (WBA) portion | 27824 |
| Calcaneus | 28400 |
| Talus | 28430 |
| Tarsal bone (other) | 28450 |
| Metatarsal | 28470 |
| Great toe, phalanx, or phalanges | 28490 |
| Phalanx or phalanges other than great toe | 28510 |
Documentation Essentials for Accurate Fracture Care Medical Coding
Thorough and accurate documentation is crucial to support the reporting of non-surgical/non-manipulative fracture care codes. Acceptable documentation must clearly indicate the provision of a medical supply for stabilization.
| Item Provided | Musculoskeletal Structure |
|---|---|
| Boot/Shoe | Ankle, foot/heel, toe(s) |
| Brace (hinged) | Elbow, thigh, knee, leg (tibia/fibula), ankle/foot/heel |
| Buddy tape | Fingers, toes |
| Cast (short/long/spica) | Arm/hand, wrist, radius, shoulder, elbow, hip, leg, knee, fibula, ankle/ foot/heel/toe |
| Crutch(es) | Ankle, foot, knee, hip |
| Immobilizer | Knee (L1830) |
| Orthosis | AFO, KAFO, CTLSO, etc. (HCPCS Level II E and L codes) |
| Ortho/Surgical shoe | See “Boot/Shoe” |
| Sling | Elbow (24670), shoulder (23520, 23540, 23570) |
| Sneaker/Sandal (soft) | See “Boot/Shoe” (ankle/foot) |
| Splint | Arm/hand/finger, shoulder, elbow, leg, knee, ankle/foot, radius, wrist (L3908) |
| Strapping/Tape | See “Buddy tape” |
| Swath (w/sling) | Humeral shaft (24500) |
| Traction (skeletal) | Arm, shoulder, leg, hip, knee, foot/toe(s) |
| Traction (skin) | Finger/phalangeal shaft/proximal/middle phalanx (26720) |
| Walking boot (Cam) | See “Boot/Shoe” |
Conversely, certain documentation elements are considered unacceptable and do not support the reporting of non-surgical/non-manipulative fracture care. These include:
- Activity modification
- Bed rest
- Dressing change only
- Elevation
- Gait/balance training
- Home exercise program
- Ice (with rest, compression, and elevation)
- Medication prescription (such as for pain control)
- Non-operative/nonsurgical treatment with no elaboration
- Non-weight bearing (NWB) with no elaboration
- Physical therapy
- Proprioception
- “Protected” WB
- Walking aid not specified
- Weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT) with no elaboration
It’s important to remember that although non-operative, non-manipulative fracture care is not surgical, it still falls under a 90-day global period. Therefore, if an E/M service is provided on the same day as fracture care, which is common, modifier 57 Decision for surgery must be appended to the E/M code. Follow-up visits within this 90-day global period (plus one day, totaling 91 days including the treatment day) should be coded using 99024 Postoperative follow-up visit, normally included in the surgical package, to indicate that an evaluation and management service was performed during a postoperative period for a reason(s) related to the original procedure, to denote that the visit is related to the initial fracture care but is separately reportable.
Fracture Care Coding Strategies: Balancing Fracture Care, Supply, and E/M Billing
A frequent discussion in fracture care medical coding revolves around whether to report a fracture care code or to bill separately for the supply, its application, and subsequent follow-up visits until fracture healing. The prevailing consensus favors utilizing the fracture care codes designated for “closed treatment without manipulation” and billing the initial E/M service with modifier 57. This approach is generally considered to more accurately represent the total work involved in providing these services, especially when supported by comprehensive documentation.
However, the optimal coding strategy can sometimes be a judgment call, varying on a case-by-case basis. For example, some orthopedic physicians suggest that minor digital fractures treated solely with buddy taping might be more appropriately reported through multiple E/M visits rather than fracture care codes, particularly if the cumulative RVUs from these visits exceed those of the fracture care code.
Another complex scenario arises in emergency room (ER) settings. While some might suggest reporting fracture care with modifier 54 Surgical care only if performed in the ER, and modifier 55 Postoperative management only for subsequent orthopedic office visits if the device fitting was done by an ER doctor, this method is generally questionable for non-operative care. This is because a) there is no surgical procedure or fracture reduction involved in closed treatment without manipulation, and b) postoperative management reimbursement typically covers only about 20 percent of the allowable charge, which would not adequately compensate for the RVUs associated with office visits.
Crucially, when reporting a non-operative, non-manipulative fracture care code, the patient’s progress note for the initial visit must clearly document a plan of action, along with evidence of provided follow-up care (coded with 99024).
Handling Incomplete Fracture Care Services in Medical Coding
In some instances, patients may discontinue care prematurely due to relocation or switching healthcare providers. In such cases, if a fracture care code was initially billed, a charge correction might be necessary to reflect the “incomplete” service. This typically involves adjusting the billing to codes for the application of the device (using a 29xxx code) and the supply codes for the materials used, instead of the fracture care code. Effective communication and collaboration between coders and billers are vital to rectify such charge errors, even if the original fracture care claim has already been paid.
Navigating Payer Rules and Exceptions in Fracture Care Medical Coding
It is essential for physicians, coders, and billers to understand that CPT® codes for closed fracture treatment without manipulation serve as “retainer fees” that encompass the physician’s comprehensive care throughout the global period. The fracture care code reimbursement is not solely for the fitting of an orthotic or other medical supply; it covers all aspects of patient care during the 90-day global period, excluding the fitting of a new supply when required.
Patients may sometimes express concern about the cost of closed treatment services upon receiving their Explanation of Benefits, as they may not fully grasp this “retainer” concept. For example, a patient might question why a significant amount was applied to their deductible for simply being fitted with a wrist splint. In such situations, it’s important to explain that the fee covers not only the splint itself but also anticipated follow-up examinations and comprehensive care over the subsequent 90 days.
While the provision of a medical supply is generally a prerequisite for reporting closed treatment without manipulation codes, there are exceptions. In serious cases, such as elderly patients with hip fractures, initial management may involve bed rest, pain control, non-weight-bearing instructions, and potential surgical planning, without immediate application of a definitive immobilizing device. Similarly, in palliative care scenarios for critically ill patients with fractures, pain management might be the primary treatment focus without any stabilizing devices. In these less typical situations, it is advisable to consult with the patient’s payer to clarify their specific guidelines for reporting closed treatment codes based on the fracture type and location.
Key Principles of Fracture Care Coding (Ground Rules)
These fundamental principles are crucial for accurate fracture care medical coding, whether for operative or non-operative treatments:
- The initial fitting of casts, splints, strappings, and other stabilizing materials is bundled into the global service package for fracture care.
- Subsequent fittings or refittings performed post-procedurally or after non-operative fracture treatment can be reported separately using modifier 58 Staged or related procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period appended to the relevant CPT® code.
- When fracture care is provided in a physician’s office (POS 11 Office), the materials used can often be billed separately using appropriate HCPCS Level II codes. Payer policies determine whether separate payment for these supplies will be made.
- In a hospital setting, the facility is responsible for billing for fracture stabilizing materials.
- A fracture is classified as closed unless explicitly documented as open or implied by the presence of a skin wound.
- A fracture is considered displaced if not specifically documented as non-displaced.
- Certain intraoperative services, such as debridement, bone grafts, or the removal of existing hardware, may be bundled into the codes for fracture surgeries.
By mastering these guidelines and nuances of fracture care medical coding, healthcare providers can ensure accurate claim submissions, optimize revenue cycles, and maintain compliance, ultimately contributing to the financial health of their practices.
[
