You might have heard the saying often attributed to Albert Einstein:
"Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."
Whether Einstein actually said it or not, the core message is powerful:
Judging everyone by the same standard can lead to inaccurate assessments of their true potential.
In the tech industry, this rings especially true when we consider how companies evaluate developers and programmers. For over seven years as a developer, I’ve observed a particular metric used to gauge developer success that often misses the mark: coding certifications.
If you’re navigating the job market, you’ve likely encountered the question, “Do Companies Care About Coding Certifications?” The answer isn’t straightforward. While certifications aim to validate your skills in computer science principles, algorithms, and general CS knowledge, their true value in the eyes of employers is more nuanced. Coding certifications come in various forms, from online courses to industry-recognized credentials, all promising to boost your career prospects.
Fundamentally, coding certifications aren’t inherently bad. They can serve as a tool to demonstrate a developer’s competency and provide a standardized measure for employers. However, like any tool, their effectiveness depends heavily on how they are used and understood within the hiring process.
So, based on my experience, let’s explore why relying too heavily on coding certifications as a primary evaluation criterion can be misleading and even detrimental in the tech industry.
1. Coding Certifications Alone Can Indicate a Lack of Holistic Evaluation
It’s understandable why companies might value coding certifications. They offer a seemingly quick way to filter candidates and provide a seemingly objective metric for comparison. Large tech companies, in particular, often use them in the initial screening stages to manage a high volume of applicants.
However, when coding certifications become a mandatory requirement or the primary measure of a developer’s worth, it can signal a lack of a comprehensive evaluation approach. It suggests that the focus is on easily filtering candidates rather than truly understanding their diverse strengths and potential.
Whether a candidate is self-taught, a seasoned developer with years of practical experience, or a fresh graduate, relying solely on certifications reduces them to a single metric. While certifications may highlight specific knowledge, they often fail to capture the full spectrum of skills and qualities that make a successful developer.
Having been on both sides of the interview table, I’ve seen firsthand how an overemphasis on certifications can undervalue real-world experience and practical skills. I’ve witnessed highly skilled coders dismissed because they lacked a specific certification, even when their portfolios and project contributions spoke volumes about their abilities.
In some cases, companies might prioritize certifications without fully understanding what those certifications truly represent in terms of practical skills. This can lead to a situation where candidates with impressive certifications but limited real-world experience are favored over those with demonstrable skills but fewer credentials.
In my view, when companies make coding certifications a rigid requirement, it suggests a disconnect from the multifaceted nature of software development and an overreliance on simplistic metrics for evaluating talent. It prioritizes ease of screening over a genuine effort to identify truly capable developers.
2. Certifications Can Unfairly Disadvantage Some Talented Candidates
Let’s assume, for a moment, that all companies genuinely care about finding the best talent and use certifications with the best intentions. Even in this ideal scenario, relying heavily on coding certifications can still create an uneven playing field.
The reality is that some individuals are inherently disadvantaged when it comes to standardized testing or certification processes. This can stem from various factors, including learning differences, test anxiety, or socioeconomic backgrounds that limit access to certification resources. This isn’t an exhaustive list, but it highlights significant barriers to certification for otherwise skilled developers.
For instance, the cost of obtaining certain certifications can be prohibitive for some candidates. Furthermore, individuals who are self-taught or have non-traditional educational backgrounds might not have had the same opportunities to pursue certifications compared to those from conventional computer science programs.
Personally, as someone who learned to code outside of formal academic settings, I initially felt the pressure to compensate for the lack of a computer science degree with certifications. However, I soon realized that practical projects and demonstrable skills were often more valued in the real world.
While certifications can be beneficial, particularly for demonstrating foundational knowledge, they shouldn’t be the sole determinant of a candidate’s potential. Over-reliance on them risks overlooking talented individuals who possess the skills and drive to succeed but may face barriers to certification.
3. Practical Skills and Experience Often Outweigh Certifications
When it comes to career advancement, especially for experienced professionals, the emphasis on coding certifications often diminishes. While entry-level candidates might benefit from certifications to showcase foundational knowledge, companies hiring mid-level and senior developers typically prioritize practical experience and a proven track record.
My personal philosophy regarding job interviews is: “You already know what you know; no need to over-prepare.” My approach has always been to present my genuine skills and experience, allowing interviewers to see how I would perform in a real work environment.
In the early stages of my career, when I lacked extensive experience, I understood the need to demonstrate a willingness to learn and take on challenges. However, even then, I secured my first tech job without needing specific certifications. The focus was on assessing my aptitude and problem-solving skills relevant to the role itself.
Now, as an experienced professional, I believe that time spent acquiring certifications for skills I won’t regularly use is time better invested in honing practical skills and staying updated with industry trends. The tech landscape is constantly evolving, and continuous learning focused on relevant technologies is far more valuable than accumulating certifications that may become outdated.
While some companies might still value certifications, particularly in specific niches or for compliance reasons, a growing number are recognizing the limitations of relying solely on them. They are shifting towards more holistic evaluation methods that include portfolio reviews, practical coding assessments, and in-depth interviews that delve into a candidate’s problem-solving abilities and real-world experience.
Ultimately, whether companies care about coding certifications depends on various factors, including the company culture, the specific role, and the overall hiring strategy. However, developers should focus on building a strong portfolio, developing practical skills, and effectively communicating their experience, as these factors often carry more weight than certifications alone.
What are your thoughts on coding certifications? Do you believe they are valuable in the tech industry? Share your opinions in the comments below!
Thanks for reading,
[
](/devsatasurion) [
Death of the Coding Test: Interview Methods that Better Evaluate Candidate Competency
Bradston Henry for Developers @ Asurion ・ Sep 21 ’22
#career #programming #discuss #interview
](https://dev.to/devsatasurion/death-of-the-coding-test-interview-methods-that-better-evaluate-candidate-competency-flj)
===CREDITS===
- Cover Photo: Monstera from Pexels
- Education System Photo: Unknown
- Woman Shrugging Photo: Polina Zimmerman from Pexels
- Disappointed Woman Photo: Andrea Piacquadio from Pexels
- Man’s Smartwatch Photo: cottonbro from Pexels
